Connect with The Tea Party!
This report – even for this administration – is unbelievable. If found to be true, someone’s head should roll… but probably won’t!
EDITORS' NOTE: According to a source close to Breitbart News and high up in the intelligence community,
the Obama administration's policy
following Muammar Gaddafi's death has been to keep a "low profile" during a chaotic time.
For this reason, according to the source, American Marines were not stationed at the U.S. embassy in Tripoli or the American mission in Benghazi,
as would typically have been the case.
In the spirit of a "low profile," the administration didn't even want an American company in charge of private security. Blue Mountain, the British
firm the State Department hired, was willing
to abide by the "no bullets" Rules of Engagement (ROE), so were a logical fit for the contract. These sub-standard protections for American diplomats
were signed by
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the ROE.
In essence, the Obama Administration tasked an unarmed British firm with security responsibilities that should have been handled by armed American
servicemen, and it was all
approved by the Secretary of State. Needless to say, the plan failed and an Ambassador was murdered, along with several others.
As of now, the State Department has not disclosed the full State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya.
Here is the full story.
The State Department selected a private British firm to provide security at the American mission in Benghazi, Libya in part because it was willing to accept
the "no bullets" rules of engagement signed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Breitbart News has learned.
On Thursday, McClatchy News reported that security on the external perimeter of the Benghazi mission was limited to a party of eight Libyan nationals,
five of whom were hired by a British private security firm, three of whom were hold over revolutionary militia "now considered part of Libya's military":
The guard, who said he had been hired seven months ago by a British company to protect the compound, said the first explosion knocked him to the
ground and he was unable to fire his weapon.
Four other contracted guards and three members of Libya's 17th of February Brigade, a group formed during the first days of the uprising against
Moammar Gadhafi and now considered part of Libya's military, were protecting the perimeter of the compound.
One explanation for this guard's statement that he was unable to fire his weapon is simply that he had no bullets in his gun, which would be consistent with
State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya.
It is unclear if the three Libyan militia members that comprised the rest of the eight-man perimeter security team were governed by the same rules of engagement
as the five Libyan nationals provided by the British firm that holds the security contract at Benghazi.
The picture of who provided security inside the mission at Benghazi, how many were in this security team, and what arms, if any, they had in their posession is still unclear.
Though it has been confirmed that two of the Americans (Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty) who were killed on the September 11, 2012 attack at the Benghazi mission were
there to provide private security, it's unclear if they were permanently stationed there and hired by the British security firm or if they were independently hired by the
State Department to serve in some other security capacity.
In her press briefing on Thursday, State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland said the American security presence inside the miss...
However, she declined to reveal how large that presence was at the time of the attack, whether they were armed and authorized to carry ammunition, and whether they
were provided as subcontractors by the British security firm hired to secure Benghazi or if they were independently hired by the State Department.
Sources tell Breitbart News that at the time of the the September 11, 2012 attack in which four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, were murdered,
there were only eight security guards for the perimeter and probably no more than four security guards for the interior of the Benghazi mission.
Under the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya, Marines were prohibited from providing security at any U.S. diploma...,
including the embassy in Tripoli and the mission in Benghazi.
The State Department denied a Friday request by Breitbart News to obtain a copy of the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya, the document that contains
the answers to the security arrangements at the Benghazi mission at the time of the September 11, 2012 attack. Later that day, Breitbart News filed a Freedom of Information Act
request to obtain the document. Usually, FOIA requests are processed within a month.
The Wall Street Journal confirmed Friday that the Libyan security guards provided by Blue Mountain, the British-Libyan private security firm hired by the State Department to
provide security at the American mission in Benghazi, were unarmed:
There also were four private security guards, all Libyans, who weren't armed and worked inside the compound. Interviews with the Libyans indicated there also
were four to eight American security guards around the compound when the attack started.
As trouble began, two Libyans posted on the outside moved inside and alerted the Libyan security forces, said Mr. Farraj, but backup
didn't arrive immediately.
Mr. Sharif said that he advised the armed security unit not to open fire so as to not inflame the situation...
As the compound was being overrun, the Americans started returning fire, said Mr. Farraj. "But we were totally outgunned. I called
more of the brigade to come
reinforce us." He said a lull developed around 11 p.m. and the Americans and Libyan military appeared to be back in control.
At this point, Mr. Farraj said,
he believed that the bulk of the American consulate staff were evacuated. But the ambassador was missing and the villa was on fire.
The Wall Street Journal puts the number of unarmed security guards provided by the British security firm at four, and places them in the
interior of the mission rather
than in the exterior perimeter.
In addition, the Journal reports that there were apparently just four Libyan military guards on the exterior perimeter of the mission, and
though they may have been armed,
they were ordered not to fire. It is unclear if this order was given consistent with the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya.
The Journal estimates the number
of private American security forces as between four and eight.
Despite the Wall Street Journal report that a British private security firm, Blue Mountain, had been contracted by the State Department
to provide security for the American
mission at Benghazi, and Breitbart's source's statement that a British private security firm had been hired by the State Department to
provide security at Benghazi,
State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland on Friday denied that the State Department had hired any private security firm to provide
security in Libya:
QUESTION: No, I’m asking whether the State Department rejected an offer from another U.S. agency to provide greater security
for installations and people in Libya
anytime over this calendar year.
MS. NULAND: Well, you will not be surprised if I am not going to speak about the internal deliberations that the U.S. Government
has or that the State Department has
with its brother and sister agencies about how the U.S. responsibilities for security are carried out.
QUESTION: Last question: Very specifically, again, at any time in the last six months did the State Department make arrangements
with one of these private security
contractors to evaluate our security situation in Libya? And did, in fact, such a contractor undertake an assessment of the security
situation in Libya for our installations there?
MS. NULAND: I can’t speak to that specifically. I can tell you that at no time did we contract with a private security firm in Libya – at no time.
We did have some individual
contracts with individual security guards, as you saw and as the Secretary spoke to.
QUESTION: (Inaudible) the claim was made yesterday that a company that is a spinoff of Blackwater, in fact, proposed or contracted
the United States Government for this
particular kind of eventuality, and it was caught up in some sort of bureaucratic --
MS. NULAND: Completely untrue with regard to Libya. I checked that this morning. At no time did we plan to hire a private
security company for Libya. (emphasis added)
QUESTION: Toria, I just want to make sure I understood that, because I didn’t understand your first question. You said – your first answer.
You said that at no time did you have
contracts with private security companies in Libya? (emphasis added)
MS. NULAND: Correct. (emphasis added)
As Obama's Libya narrative of a spontaneous attack based on a film begins to unravel, the cover-up begins. But when all signs point to a foreign
policy failure of the highest order,
hopefully the public, particularly the people who lost loved ones that day, will get the investigation they deserve.
Breitbart News has asked a spokesperson for the State Department if it considers a private American security force of between four and eight
as "robust," but the State Department
has not responded.