Let's come back down to earth and look at reality: The Senate race in California.
Boxer (a total loser and achieve-nothing) vs, Fiorina (a rep for polluting special interests and El Toro Poo Pooer and Denier of environmental science). As I see it, Fiorina's endorsement of California Proposition 23 alone demonstrates an extreme degree of scientific ignorance, or total greed via squeezing a few more dollars out of the dying earth.
Just my opinion? Here are some quotes from the media, the San Francisco Chronicle:
"Californians are left with a deeply unsatisfying choice for the U.S. Senate this year. The incumbent, Democrat Barbara Boxer, has failed to distinguish herself during her 18 years in office. The challenger, Republican Carly Fiorina,has campaigned with a vigor and directness that suggests she could be effective in Washington - but for an agenda that would undermine this nation's need to move forward on addressing serious issues such as climate change, health care and immigration."
What suggestion does the Tea Party have for this dilemma??????
More about Boxer:
"Although she is chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, it is telling that leadership on the most pressing issue before it - climate change - was shifted to Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., because the bill had become so polarized under her wing."
More about Fiorina:
"- - her support for a state initiative that would halt definitive action on climate change shows a disdain for science and a disregard for this state's potential to take the lead in an emerging green economy."
SO, AFTER NOV. 2ND CALIFORNIA PEOPLE WILL BE GUARANTEED ONE THING: BE REPRESENTED IN THE US SENATE BY A LOSER OR BY A SPECIAL-INTEREST INFLUENCED SCIENTIFIC IGNORAMUS.
Or, maybe, I should run for US Senate as write-in?